How accurate is the Textus Receptus?
The Majority Text differs from the Textus Receptus in almost 2,000 places. So the agreement is better than 99 percent. But the Majority Text differs from the modern critical text in only about 6,500 places. In other words the two texts agree almost 98 percent of the time.
What is wrong with the Alexandrian text?
Compared to these later text types, Alexandrian readings tend to be abrupt, use fewer words, show greater variation among the Synoptic Gospels, and have readings that are considered difficult.
What is the Textus Receptus based on?
Codex Vaticanus
Westcott and Hort published The New Testament in the Original Greek in 1881 in which they rejected what they considered to be the dated and inadequate Textus Receptus. Their text is based mainly on Codex Vaticanus in the Gospels.
When was the Masoretic text written?
This monumental work was begun around the 6th century ad and completed in the 10th by scholars at Talmudic academies in Babylonia and Palestine, in an effort to reproduce, as far as possible, the original text of the Hebrew Old Testament.
What is the purpose of textual criticism?
The objective of the textual critic’s work is to provide a better understanding of the creation and historical transmission of the text and its variants. This understanding may lead to the production of a “critical edition” containing a scholarly curated text.
Which is better NASB or NKJV?
Of the two (NASB or NKJV), I prefer the NASB simply because it’s a more accurate translation overall. The NKJV is more readable in English, but the process of making a translation more readable necessarily means sacrificing a certain degree of accuracy.
Is the KJV based on the Masoretic text?
The Masoretic Text is used as the basis for most Protestant translations of the Old Testament such as the King James Version, English Standard Version, New American Standard Version, and New International Version.